Hi Todd, I’m planning on proposing to my girlfriend on New Year’s Eve and would appreciate some help because I seem to be stuck in a state of analysis paralysis, thanks in part to the information provided on your web site. What I’m looking for is a one carat round diamond solitaire engagement ring in the range of G-H color, and VS-2 clarity, set in an 18k yellow gold setting. I read your article 15 Seconds to Diamond Buying Success and took note of your preferred range of proportions and found several suitable options from the vendors which you recommend. Here are the diamonds which I am considering, what do you think? — Kevin J.
Kevin writes: Using the selection criteria which you outlined on your web site, I did my best to cherry pick the best that each vendor had to offer in terms of round brilliant ideal cut diamonds in the range of one carat, G-H color and VS-2 clarity. Here are the diamonds which I chose from the inventory of the vendors which you seem to prefer:
Note that I edited the structure of the diamond description for the links…
As you indicated above, there is a set of proportions which I like to adhere to when shopping for round brilliant ideal cut diamonds, which I find works extremely well for selecting diamonds which exhibit the highest volume of light return, that set of proportions is outlined as follows:
This specific set of proportions is equivalent to the bulls-eye that appears as the center ring on a target, it is the “sweet spot” which every diamond cutter knows that they should strive for when cutting round brilliant ideal cut diamonds, but which they often stretch beyond in order to maximize the retention of diamond carat weight during the cutting process. But a few diamond cutters like Brian Gavin and Paul Slegers of Crafted by Infinity, have consistently chosen to focus on the light return and visual performance of the diamonds that they produce, rather than the final yield of carat weight.
While it is true that there are other combinations of crown and pavilion angle which produce an excellent volume of light return, the reality is that it takes a lot of experience to know exactly which specific combinations will yield similar results as the center range of proportions which I’ve outlined above, and I find that most consumers lack that type of in-depth experience that comes from being a veteran diamond buyer with almost 30 years of experience.
I am partial to the diamond grading practices of the American Gem Society Laboratory (AGSL) and the Gemological Institute of America (GIA) because I find their grading to be consistent and reliable. I generally prefer diamonds graded by the AGSL with an overall cut grade of AGS Ideal-0; as determined on their Proprietary Light Performance grading platform, which uses Angular Spectrum Evaluation Technology (ASET) to measure the brightness of a diamond, and which provides insight into the optical symmetry of the facet structure. Refer to my article What do the different colors of an ASET mean, for a full explanation of how to understand the ASET image pictured to the left.[separator]
The ASET image featured above is from the 1.013 carat, G-color, VS-2 clarity, Brian Gavin Signature Diamond with medium blue fluorescence, which we’ll get into in just a moment. In addition to offering diamonds which are graded by the AGSL, Brian Gavin also provides images of the diamonds as seen through the various reflector scopes which are used to judge the level of optical symmetry of the diamond, such as an ASET Scope, an Ideal Scope, and a Hearts & Arrows Scope.
If the diamond is graded by the GIA, then I prefer that it have an overall cut grade of GIA Excellent and that the seller provide images of the diamond as seen through the various reflectors scopes mentioned in the last paragraph. However I’ve noticed that the majority of online diamond vendors do not provide reflector scope images of the diamonds which they represent, most likely because they realize that doing so cause people to question the cut quality of their diamonds due to the inconsistency of the patterns exhibited.
All right, let’s get down to brass tacks and look at the characteristics of each of the diamonds which you’ve selected, the first thing I noticed is that all of them are graded by the American Gem Society Laboratory (AGSL) with an overall cut grade of AGS Ideal-0, and cut within my preferred range of proportions, so we don’t need to get into those details because everything is spot-on. Taking the diamonds in the order of carat weight, as they are presented:
The 1.013 carat, G-color, VS-2 clarity, Brian Gavin Signature Diamond with medium blue fluorescence is definitely a diamond which I would choose myself because I’m a huge fan of diamonds with blue fluorescence. The medium blue fluorescence might even give the G-color a little boost towards the high side of the G-color range. The primary inclusions consist of diamond crystals; clouds, which are simply small clusters of pinpoint size diamond crystals; and needle shaped diamond crystals; which happen to be my favorite type of inclusions because they are simply tiny diamonds that were trapped within the larger diamond crystal as it formed.[separator]
As with all of the diamonds featured within the Brian Gavin Signature and Brian Gavin Blue collections, the diamond details page provides a three dimensional video of the diamond which shows the vivid contrast and sparkle created by the exceptional optical symmetry that this diamond has been cut to.
The clarity photograph provided to the left shows the inclusions within this 1.038 carat, G-color, VS-2 clarity, Hearts & Arrows Diamond from Crafted by Infinity via High Performance Diamonds. The loupe tool provides additional insight by making it possible to view the inclusions at a larger magnification, and the diamond crystals and feather within this diamond look very slight. Although there is not a video of the diamond provided on the diamond details page, I know that Wink will shoot a video of the diamond upon request… just tell him that I said so! Laughs! Who knows, he might even personalize it for you and then you can share it with your fiance after you present her with the diamond![separator]
As you can see from the picture to the left, the hearts pattern within this 1.132 carat, G-color, VS-2 clarity, Brian Gavin Signature Hearts & Arrows Diamond is absolutely gorgeous! According to a study conducted by the AGSL on the sparkle factor of a diamond, diamonds cut to this level of precision exhibit a higher volume of light return and larger flashes of sparkle. It should be noted that while Brian Gavin does not market the diamonds from the Brian Gavin Blue collection as H&A diamonds, they are produced by the same diamond cutters and the ones which I’ve examined show patterns which are pretty darn good, so I would not hesitate to buy a diamond from either collection.[separator]
The hearts pattern exhibited by this 1.135 carat, H-color, VS-2 clarity, Hearts & Arrows Diamond from Crafted by Infinity via HPD is equally impressive and it should be noted that I consider the production of Brian Gavin and Paul Slegers to be on equal footing, with no preference for the production of one diamond cutter over the other… my decision to recommend a diamond from Brian Gavin or Crafted by Infinity usually has more to do with the current availability than a difference in production quality. Here again, the primary inclusions are diamond crystals and clouds of pinpoint size diamond crystals so there is nothing to worry about. I’d grab this diamond in a second.[separator]
You just need to mouse over the hearts and arrows icon provided on the diamond details page in order to see the hearts and arrows image for this 1.138 carat, H-color, VS-2 clarity, True Hearts Diamond from James Allen and when you do so, you’ll see that the pattern is pretty good, with just a little bit of variation in the size and shape of the hearts, as well as a little bending in the tips of the hearts, which is evidence of minor degrees of azamet shift. This is not something which would prevent me from purchasing this diamond, it is merely a characteristic of the overall cut quality of the diamond and I mention it because such things are taken into account at this level of the game.[separator]
I have to say that you did an excellent job of selecting some exceptional diamonds from my preferred list of vendors Kevin, and I don’t see one which necessarily stands out over another. I have to say that if I were still buying diamonds for Nice Ice, that every one of these diamonds would have made it into our inventory… thus how do I pick a favorite?
The proportions are essentially equal, so is the level of optical symmetry with very little variance… and the inclusions are essentially the same… did you select these just to torture me? No wonder you haven’t made a decision, it’s not a matter of analysis paralysis, it’s just a matter of trying to make a choice between five diamonds which are pretty much the same! Honestly, I’d pin this list of diamonds to the wall, blindfold yourself, spin yourself around in a circle three times, and then pin the tail on the donkey… in this particular instance, it’s not a bad way to reach a decision.
Todd Gray is a professional diamond buyer with 30+ years of trade experience. He loves to teach people how to buy diamonds that exhibit incredible light performance! In addition to writing for Nice Ice, Todd "ghost writes" blogs and educational content for other diamond sites. When Todd isn't chained to a desk, or consulting for the trade, he enjoys Freediving! (that's like scuba diving, but without air tanks)
James Allen Engagement Ring Reviews, the Best Rated of 201928 Dec, 2019
Sylvie Engagement Rings (designed by a woman for a woman)13 Dec, 2019
Fancy Colored Diamonds Buying Guide and Tips05 Sep, 2019
The Best Setting for Cushion Cut Diamonds (How to Maximize the Sparkle)30 Aug, 2019
Jeff Cooper Tracie vs Brian Gavin Anita Halo (Brilliant duo)27 Aug, 2019
French Set Halo Ritani vs Brian Gavin Anita in 2019 (which Sparkles more)12 Aug, 2019
Tiffany Solitaire Style Engagement Rings (Top 5 Best + Pics)27 Jul, 2018
Karlie Kloss Engaged! See the Ring and Get the Look